Termito

[Dropped][PENDING][CI_Faction] - [Ftm_Titan_Swann, Zadnis, Ftm_Natas_Swann,...] RDM (Random Death Match)

17 posts in this topic

There isn't really a case here, the whole castle was a warzone throughout all this.

 

17 hours ago, Termito said:

Proof, and/or anything that will help the investigation:
Logs

 

17 hours ago, Termito said:

Would you accept a refund from the accused player? If so specify the amount: No

These are the 2 classic signs of a low-effort banmongering complaint

I have a recording of the whole thing, but I won't have time to look over it until the evening. It'll show the warzone, it'll show Swann leadership telling us that the CI were about to kill us (giving us all a strong reason to preemptively attack them, for our own self preservation, and that would be our leadership's responsibility for telling us we were in danger) and it'll show that a general skirmish happened between the CI faction, and the Swann faction

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Spudgun said:

I have a recording of the whole thing, but I won't have time to look over it until the evening. It'll show the warzone, it'll show Swann leadership telling us that the CI were about to kill us (giving us all a strong reason to preemptively attack them, for our own self preservation, and that would be our leadership's responsibility for telling us we were in danger) and it'll show that a general skirmish happened between the CI faction, and the Swann faction

I prefer the whole thing if you will have time to upload but if not please provide the very first moment of the fight including them peacing and retreat.

Edited by Evilmay
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

  Hide contents

 

19:07:42 - Coronas Ibéricas and Duchy of Brandenburg have made peace.

19:14:37 - House Swann and Duchy of Brandenburg have made peace.

 

 

  Hide contents

 

18:58:02 - CI_Infante_Ikki (FID: 3) attacked Ranger_Pentium_Swann (FID: -1) with fist dealing 0 damage.

19:06:54 - Knight_Spudgun_Swann (FID: 6) attacked CI_Milicia_Earnur (FID: -1) with Military Hammer dealing 16 damage.

19:06:59 - Knight_Spudgun_Swann (FID: 6) attacked CI_Infante_Ikki (FID: -1) with Military Hammer dealing 22 damage.

19:06:59 - Ranger_Pentium_Swann (FID: 6) attacked Ftm_Natas_Swann (FID: -1) with fist dealing 0 damage.

19:07:03 - Knight_Spudgun_Swann (FID: 6) attacked CI_Infante_Ikki (FID: -1) with Military Hammer dealing 26 damage.

19:07:05 - CI_Milicia_Earnur attacked Knight_Spudgun_Swann's shield with Warhammer dealing 50 damage.

19:07:07 - Horse (CI_Infante_NotAntonio FID: 3)) attacked Squire_Gotfri_Swann FID: 6) dealing 0 damage.

19:07:09 - Ftm_Axko*_Swann (FID: 6) attacked Horse (CI_Infante_NotAntonio FID: 3)) with Iberian Mace dealing 38 damage.

19:07:09 - Ftm_Axko*_Swann (FID: 6) attacked CI_Infante_NotAntonio (FID: -1) with Iberian Mace dealing 21 damage.

19:07:10 - Ftm_Axko*_Swann (FID: 6) attacked Horse (CI_Infante_NotAntonio FID: 3)) with Iberian Mace dealing 41 damage.

19:07:10 - Horse (CI_Infante_NotAntonio FID: 3)) attacked Maester_Gadsby_Swann FID: 6) dealing 0 damage.

19:07:12 - Horse (CI_Infante_NotAntonio FID: 3)) attacked Ranger_Pentium_Swann FID: 6) dealing 0 damage.

19:07:13 - Ftm_Axko*_Swann (FID: 6) attacked Horse (CI_Infante_NotAntonio FID: 3)) with Iberian Mace dealing 38 damage.

19:07:16 - CI_Infante_NotAntonio (FID: 3) attacked Ftm_Natas_Swann (FID: -1) with Heavy Lance dealing 7 damage.

19:07:18 - CI_Infante_NotAntonio (FID: 3) attacked Hunty_Of_Saxony (FID: -1) with Heavy Lance dealing 3 damage.

19:07:22 - CI_Infante_NotAntonio attacked Hunty_Of_Saxony's shield with Heavy Lance dealing 68 damage.

19:07:22 - Ftm_Natas_Swann (FID: 6) attacked Horse (CI_Sargento_Himura FID: 3)) with Morningstar dealing 49 damage.

19:07:22 - Ftm_Natas_Swann (FID: 6) attacked CI_Sargento_Himura (FID: -1) with Morningstar dealing 12 damage.

19:07:23 - Lord_Bronxh_Swann (FID: 6) attacked CI_Infante_NotAntonio (FID: -1) with Iberian Mace dealing 52 damage.

19:07:23 - Hunty_Of_Saxony (FID: 6) attacked CI_Infante_NotAntonio (FID: -1) with Spiked Mace dealing 38 damage.

19:07:23 - Hunty_Of_Saxony <img=ico_blunt> CI_Infante_NotAntonio

19:07:23 - Hunty_Of_Saxony killed a member of a friendly faction!

19:07:24 - Horse (CI_Sargento_Himura FID: 3)) attacked Ftm_Axko*_Swann FID: 6) dealing 0 damage.

19:07:32 - CI_Infante_Leyenda (FID: 3) attacked Knight_Spudgun_Swann (FID: -1) with Spiked Mace dealing 15 damage.

19:07:33 - CI_Infante_Leyenda attacked Knight_Spudgun_Swann's shield with Spiked Mace dealing 32 damage.

19:07:37 - CI_Infante_Leyenda attacked Knight_Spudgun_Swann's shield with Spiked Mace dealing 47 damage.

19:07:38 - CI_Infante_Leyenda attacked Knight_Spudgun_Swann's shield with Spiked Mace dealing 47 damage.

19:07:39 - Knight_Spudgun_Swann (FID: 6) attacked CI_Infante_Leyenda (FID: -1) with Military Hammer dealing 14 damage.

19:07:41 - Ftm_Natas_Swann (FID: 6) attacked Caden_Tristan_Of_Verindith (FID: -1) with Morningstar dealing 39 damage.

19:07:41 - Lord_Bronxh_Swann (FID: 6) attacked CI_Milicia_Aguila_Rubia (FID: -1) with Iberian Mace dealing 14 damage.

19:07:42 - CI_Infante_Leyenda (FID: 3) attacked Serjeant_Humphrey_Swann (FID: -1) with Spiked Mace dealing 13 damage.

19:07:43 - Horse (CI_Sargento_Himura FID: 3)) attacked Knight_Spudgun_Swann FID: 6) dealing 0 damage.

19:07:43 - CI_Milicia_Earnur (FID: 3) attacked King_Jacko_Swann (FID: -1) with Warhammer dealing 9 damage.

19:07:52 - Horse (CI_Sargento_Himura FID: 3)) attacked Walo_Of_Saxony FID: 6) dealing 0 damage.

19:07:54 - Knight_Spudgun_Swann attacked CI_Infante_Leyenda's shield with Military Hammer dealing 60 damage.

19:07:57 - Knight_Spudgun_Swann (FID: 6) attacked CI_Infante_Leyenda (FID: -1) with Military Hammer dealing 18 damage.

19:07:58 - Knight_Spudgun_Swann (FID: 6) attacked CI_Infante_Leyenda (FID: -1) with Military Hammer dealing 18 damage.

19:07:59 - Ftm_Titan_Swann attacked CI_Infante_Leyenda's shield with Spiked Mace dealing 56 damage.

19:08:01 - CI_Infante_Leyenda (FID: 3) attacked Ftm_Titan_Swann (FID: -1) with Spiked Mace dealing 10 damage.

19:08:01 - Ftm_Natas_Swann (FID: 6) attacked CI_Infante_Leyenda (FID: -1) with Morningstar dealing 23 damage.

19:08:01 - Ftm_Natas_Swann <img=ico_morningstar> CI_Infante_Leyenda

19:08:01 - Ftm_Natas_Swann killed a member of a friendly faction!

19:08:02 - Ftm_StormKi_Swann (FID: 6) attacked CI_Milicia_Earnur (FID: -1) with Spiked Mace dealing 12 damage.

19:08:04 - Ftm_StormKi_Swann attacked CI_Milicia_Earnur's shield with Spiked Mace dealing 38 damage.

19:08:04 - Horse (CI_Infante_N36R4 FID: 3)) attacked Militia_krea_the_duck_Swann FID: 6) dealing 0 damage.

19:08:06 - Ftm_StormKi_Swann attacked CI_Milicia_Earnur's shield with Spiked Mace dealing 48 damage.

19:08:07 - Ftm_StormKi_Swann attacked CI_Milicia_Earnur's shield with Spiked Mace dealing 20 damage.

19:08:08 - CI_Milicia_Earnur (FID: 3) attacked Ftm_StormKi_Swann (FID: -1) with Warhammer dealing 12 damage.

19:08:10 - Ftm_StormKi_Swann (FID: 6) attacked CI_Milicia_Earnur (FID: -1) with Spiked Mace dealing 24 damage.

19:08:16 - KingsGuard_Celwyn_Swann (FID: 6) attacked CI_Milicia_Earnur (FID: -1) with Military Hammer dealing 13 damage.

19:08:16 - KingsGuard_Celwyn_Swann <img=ico_blunt> CI_Milicia_Earnur

19:08:16 - KingsGuard_Celwyn_Swann killed a member of a friendly faction!

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, Termito said:

at the minute 0:38 of the video u can see ur people hitting antonio for no reason.

https://gyazo.com/937dfa00af2319c0fde21d2d766e9601 Antonio not fighting anyone

https://gyazo.com/3b6953d5ed1c2e4478159869d165a627 Swann attacking Antonio for no reason.

As I've said, you can clearly see antonio hitting other Swanns that weren't hitting him, resulting that he did commit RDM anyway. And I'm fairly certain he started attacking and on top of that was being a big obstacle to us.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Alright lads, I looked at my footage and those logs that Evilmay posted, and familiarised myself with the whole situation again.

I was the first to attack CI people, all the hostilities between us were starting by me, I'll take that responsibility. I don't know if the warzone rules, or my own reasons, make it legal or not. I don't know. I'll hand out any refunds (even though the complaint is banmongery and says "no" to refunds) or punishment.

My reason for attacking the Mexicans was that our leadership told us that the CI were about to attack us all and fight with the enemy. I made a pre-emptive attack on some CI people in order to give us the best chance of surviving. I made the choice based on the war situation, instead of the rules. That's no excuse for anything, I'm just saying what I did. My footage shows us being told clearly, many times, that we were in imminent danger from the CI faction. And it also shows all of the movements, positioning and body language of the CI which backed up the suspicion of this threat.

I hope my honesty will lead to some honesty from the complainers, like I said, it's very low-effort and banmongery. It just says "they attacked us for no reason - look at the logs", and it doesn't take into account the situation whatsoever.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

CI leadership has informed me they would like to drop this complaint.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.