Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Yaroglekk

[INVALID][PENDING][*Captain*] - [GodlingHermes] RDM (Random Death Match)

12 posts in this topic

Your in-game name at the time of the incident: *Captain*

The person(s) you are reporting: GodlingHermes

The time and date of the incident: 16:40 - 21/09/2018

What you are reporting them for: RDM (Random Death Match)

The full story:
So, I was maneuvering my ship to the Port of Praven, there were some HRE members at the bridge, one of them said "Thats my ship now!" I answered "This is my Ship" then Hermes shot me.

Proof, and/or anything that will help the investigation:
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1518632897

Would you accept a refund from the accused player? If so specify the amount: Yes, 30000 Gold


0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Logs:

I used Roderick to cross-reference the logs and found that GodlingHermes did in fact halt you:

Spoiler

16:39:48 - *LOCAL* [GodlingHermes] cpt halt 
 16:39:51 - *LOCAL* [GodlingHermes] show pouch 
 16:40:04 - [HRE_Squire_Roderick] oh 
 16:40:05 - GodlingHermes hit a ship (IID: 1706). 
 16:40:10 - [HRE_Squire_Roderick] that we arent at war lol 
 16:40:12 - GodlingHermes attacked *Captain* with Heavy Crossbow dealing 41 damage. 
 16:40:15 - [HRE_Squire_Roderick] sry michel 
 16:40:20 - [HRE_Squire_Roderick] didnt know 
 16:40:27 - GodlingHermes attacked *Captain* with Heavy Crossbow dealing 109 damage. 
 16:40:27 - GodlingHermes <img=ico_headshot> *Captain* 
 

However, your ss logs and the halt are 13 seconds apart. Any chance you have an earlier screenshot or any other evidence that proves you didn't see Hermes' halt?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pending.

From now on involved community members have 24 hours to provide any additional evidence or hints that could be useful to the admin.

Refrain from posting unless you add newly found evidence or a reasonable defence towards the complaint itself if you are the accused player. If you fail to follow the complaint rules admins reserve the right to give out warning points accordingly.

[automated message]

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not my prob he didn't see the halt I was 2 m in front of him.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Natty said:

Logs:

I used Roderick to cross-reference the logs and found that GodlingHermes did in fact halt you:

  Reveal hidden contents


16:39:48 - *LOCAL* [GodlingHermes] cpt halt 
 16:39:51 - *LOCAL* [GodlingHermes] show pouch 
 16:40:04 - [HRE_Squire_Roderick] oh 
 16:40:05 - GodlingHermes hit a ship (IID: 1706). 
 16:40:10 - [HRE_Squire_Roderick] that we arent at war lol 
 16:40:12 - GodlingHermes attacked *Captain* with Heavy Crossbow dealing 41 damage. 
 16:40:15 - [HRE_Squire_Roderick] sry michel 
 16:40:20 - [HRE_Squire_Roderick] didnt know 
 16:40:27 - GodlingHermes attacked *Captain* with Heavy Crossbow dealing 109 damage. 
 16:40:27 - GodlingHermes <img=ico_headshot> *Captain* 
 

However, your ss logs and the halt are 13 seconds apart. Any chance you have an earlier screenshot or any other evidence that proves you didn't see Hermes' halt?

https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1519248734 ico_external_link.gif

https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1518632897

I couldnt see what he wrote ._.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Hermes as the person halting it is your responsibility to ensure that the person you're halting is in range. I'm sure a suitable refund can be worked out in this case.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It can be worked of course, but his SS proves that he was in fact, within the range of Q halt. Come on now, you have a hard evidence of that.

 

Edit: By the way, I am not refunding him 30 k, that's ridiculous. As you see he lost shit that is no more than 1k, and I am willing to refund him 5k, if this is somehow deemed valid. If he declines then i prefer the ban instead of being unreasonably milked.

Edited by Hermes
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Hermes said:

It can be worked of course, but his SS proves that he was in fact, within the range of Q halt. Come on now, you have a hard evidence of that.

 

Edit: By the way, I am not refunding him 30 k, that's ridiculous. As you see he lost shit that is no more than 1k, and I am willing to refund him 5k, if this is somehow deemed valid. If he declines then i prefer the ban instead of being unreasonably milked.

The evidence shows he was in range at 16:40:04, but the halt was 13 seconds earlier.

@Yaroglekk unless you have another ss from a few seconds earlier that proves you did not receive the halt then this complaint will have to be marked as invalid...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Hermes said:

It can be worked of course, but his SS proves that he was in fact, within the range of Q halt. Come on now, you have a hard evidence of that.

 

Edit: By the way, I am not refunding him 30 k, that's ridiculous. As you see he lost shit that is no more than 1k, and I am willing to refund him 5k, if this is somehow deemed valid. If he declines then i prefer the ban instead of being unreasonably milked.

I had a warhorn, thats about 25k in store.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Natty said:

The evidence shows he was in range at 16:40:04, but the halt was 13 seconds earlier.

@Yaroglekk unless you have another ss from a few seconds earlier that proves you did not receive the halt then this complaint will have to be marked as invalid...

I got no other screenshots...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0