Natty

Forum Staff
  • Content count

    389
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

125 Excellent

1 Follower

About Natty

  • Rank
    Lord

Recent Profile Visitors

1801 profile views
  1. Here are the logs from when ooga says help to where Ares halts you: As you can see neither Ares nor I_ express much interest in killing you. In fact you seem to be the one drawing attention to the 'help' in global chat which would have been an invalid kill reason anyway. I recommend you move away from blaming a call in global chat as a cause for you being attacked and rather the fact that Ares halted you later on and you breaking the rules by combat logging. @Sak would you consider a refund?
  2. Pending. From now on involved community members have 24 hours to provide any additional evidence or hints that could be useful to the admin. Refrain from posting unless you add newly found evidence or a reasonable defence towards the complaint itself if you are the accused player. If you fail to follow the complaint rules admins reserve the right to give out warning points accordingly. [automated message]
  3. Logs: I used Roderick to cross-reference the logs and found that GodlingHermes did in fact halt you: However, your ss logs and the halt are 13 seconds apart. Any chance you have an earlier screenshot or any other evidence that proves you didn't see Hermes' halt?
  4. Accepted & moved. [automated message]
  5. Pending. From now on involved community members have 24 hours to provide any additional evidence or hints that could be useful to the admin. Refrain from posting unless you add newly found evidence or a reasonable defence towards the complaint itself if you are the accused player. If you fail to follow the complaint rules admins reserve the right to give out warning points accordingly. [automated message]
  6. Logs: Below shows Szot was in the Red fac - for future reference. 10:54:16 - *FACTION* Red Faction [szot1980] jak jest zasiac ?XD First Kill - Valid 10:54:24 - *LOCAL* [I_] halt red faction 10:54:28 - szot1980 has dismounted a Cart Horse (AID: 10). 10:54:32 - I_ attacked szot1980 with Heavy Lance dealing 42 damage. 10:54:32 - I_ <img=ico_spear> szot1980 The NRR by szot - 'You may not attack your previous killers unless in a war or skirmish' etc. 10:55:47 - *LOCAL* [I_] halt capture 10:55:53 - szot1980 picked up Mining Pick(IID: 3423) from the ground. 10:55:53 - *LOCAL* [I_] halt capture 10:55:55 - *LOCAL* [I_] sheah 10:55:56 - CaptureTheFlag attacked Horse (I_) with Heavy Lance dealing 22 damage. 10:55:58 - *LOCAL* [I_] okey 10:55:59 - I_ has dismounted a Courser (AID: 3). 10:56:05 - *LOCAL* [I_] nrr? 10:56:07 - CaptureTheFlag attacked I_ with Heavy Lance dealing 4 damage. 10:56:08 - szot1980 attacked I_ with Mining Pick dealing 43 damage. 10:56:08 - CaptureTheFlag attacked I_ with fist dealing 8 damage. 10:56:09 - CaptureTheFlag attacked I_ with Heavy Lance dealing 28 damage. 10:56:10 - szot1980 attacked I_ with Mining Pick dealing 38 damage. 10:56:10 - szot1980 <img=ico_spear> I_ Looks like a fairly obvious case of NRR. Nonetheless I will leave some time for the accused to respond.
  7. Pending. From now on involved community members have 24 hours to provide any additional evidence or hints that could be useful to the admin. Refrain from posting unless you add newly found evidence or a reasonable defence towards the complaint itself if you are the accused player. If you fail to follow the complaint rules admins reserve the right to give out warning points accordingly. [automated message]
  8. Logs: Looks as though Ares and I_ were not responding to the 'call for help' in global but the halt mentioned above. Unless you can provide evidence that you failed to see the halt then you logging off less than 30 seconds after being in an active fight will be classed as combat log and you will be punished accordingly.
  9. Solved & moved. The complaint was solved by the admin and his verdict is the final judgement. If you have evidence that the verdict was given upon wrong proof, you may dispute the verdict by posting a ban appeal, message the admin on the forum or posting an admin complaint in this order. If you feel you were handled unfairly without valid evidence you cannot dispute the verdict. [automated message]
  10. Invalid & moved. The complaint was invalidated by the admin and his verdict is the final judgement. If you have evidence that the verdict was given upon wrong proof, you may dispute the verdict by posting a ban appeal, message the admin on the forum or posting an admin complaint in this order. If you feel you were handled unfairly without valid evidence you cannot dispute the verdict. [automated message]
  11. If you'd taken that 1 second earlier it would've showed whether you saw the halt or not - Roger's message should have been just above Nurthis' ':P' 18:19:29 - *LOCAL* [Roger_Baratheon] Sarazsan halt 18:19:29 - *FACTION* Coronas Ibéricas & Templars [Templar_Squire_Nurthis] :P However, as there is no evidence that you failed to see the halt I can only assume that you did not comply with Roger's demands. As a result, this complaint is invalid.
  12. Do you have any evidence of you not seeing the halt? If not I'm afraid this complaint will be marked as invalid.
  13. Solved & moved. The complaint was solved by the admin and his verdict is the final judgement. If you have evidence that the verdict was given upon wrong proof, you may dispute the verdict by posting a ban appeal, message the admin on the forum or posting an admin complaint in this order. If you feel you were handled unfairly without valid evidence you cannot dispute the verdict. [automated message]