Benji

Phoenix Player
  • Content count

    1617
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1034 Excellent

3 Followers

About Benji

  • Rank
    King

Recent Profile Visitors

3030 profile views
  1. Hey @cav_Bogdan Thought I'd just let you know that the Staff have a neat Complaint filler for you to use as if you look at any of the other complaints, yours is not in the correct Format. Make sure you use this link! -> http://pw-phoenix.com/forum/index.php?/playercomplaint
  2. Process the refund @MrOtto and thank you @Isaac for being reasonable.
  3. Posting on behalf of ggikec2: The Logs that you've provided aren't sufficient and cut off just before each event. Isaac had been chasing me multiple times, kicking, aiming and harassing me throughout my play session. I'll admit that I did RDM Isaac once in retaliation for this harassment but I would like to take the opportunity to highlight the other two sets of logs which clearly show Isaac RDMing me. Should I make a separate report for that @MrOtto or will you solve it all here? Regardless of the outcome there is no point in both of us being punished for something that can be easily rectified with a refund. If Isaac can provide a screenshot of his gear I'll refund the Flat amount that its worth. If he can't then the offer of a 10,000 refund is up. Enjoy the rest of your day.
  4. This has happened for the past 2 years, changing the NRR rule into one that can be abused so easily and loopholed just from its conception will not help PK, it will just hinder it further. This will only make it more appeasing to not war people anymore as now skirmishes are indefinite, whats the point in war? Also, please dont do a Tommy here and implement a rule when it has a 51% or extremely close approval rating. Make it a 70% or 65% needed approval for this to go through, as this can be really hit or miss and will lead to a lot of loopholing.
  5. No, this will create endless and indefinite skirmishes. The current way it works, with it needing to be a Skirmish (2v2 or more) for people to be able to break NRR has worked for years and means that people cannot re-initiate the same Skirmish indefinitely. With the rule you are proposing, in a 10v10 scenario; I would technically be able to run away when all 9 of my team-mates die and then re-initiate the skirmish allowing everyone to break constant NRR on everyone. I personally enjoy skirmishes that can actually end. This will also make it harder for Admins to search for logs. __________________________________________________ This is also what I posted in the Previous thread, which relates.
  6. The hero we need, but not the one we deserve. Welcome to a better life brother.
  7. Your in-game name at the time of the incident: ggikec2 The person(s) you are reporting: HRE_Ftm_Aitor The time and date of the incident: 18:20 - 28/07/2018 What you are reporting them for: RDM (Random Death Match) The full story: (Posting for Ggikec) The war had ended and I left the spawn, only to be killed by Aitor. Proof, and/or anything that will help the investigation: Logs will do. Would you accept a refund from the accused player? If so specify the amount: No
  8. Your in-game name when you were banned: Irrelevant Your GUID (not required): Irrelevant Why you think you were banned: I can't remember, but I assume it was for being a twat. Sorry. Why you should be unbanned: Because I want to be able to use the Shoutbox again. Any other information that might be useful: -
  9. Breaking rules can be occasionally quite funny and a laugh, those who don't understand that and think that an Admin should be a professional Figure 100% of the time really isn't being realistic. If you can't take a light bit of memes and jokes with that shit then how can you expect to not keep your cool during intense situations? I've always been a fan of just allowing potential applicants a chance, everything they do can be easily reverted as everything is logged.
  10. Where is this written? You aren't clarifying the rules just putting forth your opinion. Also as far as I know but can be corrected. I was told by @William and @Henricus that it only counts as a killreason if it is specifically directed at you. For example: "Kill yourself" <-- Not Kill reason. "Kill yourself Evilmay" <-- Evilmay has a kill reason.
  11. Just to further clarify as I was in a HOI4 game. The way it works right now as far as I know (Admins feel free to correct me) in a Skirmish situation is that if its a 2v2 or more you can rejoin the Skirmish as the NRR is voided. In a hypothetical situation where what people are proposing is put forth. Situation 1 Player A and B are fighting Player 1,2,3 and 4. Player B dies and Player 1,2 and 3 have died but 4 is still alive. Making it 1v1. Player A now has to constantly fight 1,2,3 and 4 over and over until all of them finally die. As they are constantly able to rejoin over and over until the enemy is dead. Situation 2 Player A and B fight Player 1 and 2. 2 Dies, returns. B dies, returns. A dies, returns. 1 dies, returns. This is an indefinite cycle, when you have clans fighting each other in a Skirmish you have an indefinite skirmish. This also brings up the problem of what if one player hides and then "Re-activates" the skirmish each time everyone else dies? This causes an absolute shitstorm and alls I will say is good luck finding an Admin who wants to search through 1,000 logs of people dying over and over.
  12. It works just fine as is? What is the point of forcing the community into re-learning a rule that has worked fine up until this point for about 2 years?
  13. "Do you want to admit to moving during the Halt before you get banned for Banmongering?" - Posted on behalf of Aurion. (His words, not mine.)
  14. I was kicked due to not conforming with the current ideals of the Staff Team which is pure professionalism. I broke rules on the NA server, not here. And to be honest it was fucking funny, I dont care. I play this game for fun and to troll. Funny how this Badmin you speak of was able to maintain adminship throughout a 1-1 and a half years without problems. People only remember the minor mistakes which are about 3/10000 of the situations they have been in and dont care about all the other times they were just fine. If you really want to try and be a child and one up people by insulting them then go all out, in global. Not on your clan members Admin Application. You are also just forwarding the notion of "You can't insult me because you did something similar". Newsflash, that makes both parties guilty and only confirms the fact that Monsnic did something bad by the fact you feel the need to fight back with insults. It would be better for him if you just allowed Admins to look at the App at face value for the facts instead of the low quality posts people like you pollute it with. People with your mentality is the reason why Admin Complaints, Apps and Major Complaints end up with 10 pages+. This type of talk is for global not the forums.