Techno

Head Admin
  • Content count

    810
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Techno

  1. Invalid & moved. The complaint was invalidated by the admin and his verdict is the final judgement. If you have evidence that the verdict was given upon wrong proof, you may dispute the verdict by posting a ban appeal, message the admin on the forum or posting an admin complaint in this order. If you feel you were handled unfairly without valid evidence you cannot dispute the verdict. [automated message]
  2. Henricus and I have spoken about this and this was clearly not a rulebreak. The admin team as a whole has allowed for back stabs in wars to take place and we do not plan to change how PW was played for the last 6 years. But we do acknowledge that some players may not have been aware of it as it is apart of the "extended ruleset" which was a guide for how to handle specific situations accessible only by members of staff but could also be used to give clarification of rules to players upon request. As such Jacko will receive a 1 million gold refund through the calculating of 40 members lost at 25k on average per player.Complaint invalid.
  3. Pending. From now on involved community members have 24 hours to provide any additional evidence or hints that could be useful to the admin. Refrain from posting unless you add newly found evidence or a reasonable defence towards the complaint itself if you are the accused player. If you fail to follow the complaint rules admins reserve the right to give out warning points accordingly. [automated message]
  4. This complaint will be reviewed and solved me. I will lock this complaint till it is solved.
  5. Solved & moved. The complaint was solved by the admin and his verdict is the final judgement. If you have evidence that the verdict was given upon wrong proof, you may dispute the verdict by posting a ban appeal, message the admin on the forum or posting an admin complaint in this order. If you feel you were handled unfairly without valid evidence you cannot dispute the verdict. [automated message]
  6. Ok so in the logs you can see Aitor said " 18:46:32 - *FACTION* House Swann [Knight_Aitor_Swann] loot it fast and just log after the war was declared you were well aware that their was a war going on, I do not appreciate you lying to me. I have been looking over this complaint and technically none of these log offs would be allowed. the players took the risk of staying to get more / better gear and got caught up in a war. Though a fear of losing their gear they then all logged out together on the orders/suggestion of Aitor. A accepted alternative if they really had to go was to use the suicide command and log off while dead. As such Aitor will be found guilty of mass combat log and due to the lying will serve a ban until appeal and his gear will be wiped. Edit: I spoke to Maxxxio and I will be removing the l lieing part of the punishment Aitor will now be banned for only 2 days for mass clog.
  7. Pending. From now on involved community members have 24 hours to provide any additional evidence or hints that could be useful to the admin. Refrain from posting unless you add newly found evidence or a reasonable defence towards the complaint itself if you are the accused player. If you fail to follow the complaint rules admins reserve the right to give out warning points accordingly. [automated message]
  8. Here are the logs I bolded when he war started. I will give both sides time to make their arguments.
  9. Denied & moved. Your appeal to be unbanned has been denied. If not mentioned by the admin otherwise, wait a reasonable amount of time before posting your next appeal. If you keep spamming appeals in order to get unbanned faster, your ban will be extended further. [automated message]
  10. I have looked further into your case and your appeal has been denied.
  11. Denied & moved. Your appeal to be unbanned has been denied. If not mentioned by the admin otherwise, wait a reasonable amount of time before posting your next appeal. If you keep spamming appeals in order to get unbanned faster, your ban will be extended further. [automated message]
  12. I have looked further into your case and your appeal has been denied.
  13. MassRDM, clog, banevading - NO APPEAL Ted Banned you but as he is no longer in the team I will handle your appeal. Can you elaborate on how you are different and give examples?
  14. MassRDM, clog, banevading - NO APPEAL You were banned by Ted who is not a member of staff so you could you please elaborate on what happened.
  15. Solved & moved. The complaint was solved by the admin and his verdict is the final judgement. If you have evidence that the verdict was given upon wrong proof, you may dispute the verdict by posting a ban appeal, message the admin on the forum or posting an admin complaint in this order. If you feel you were handled unfairly without valid evidence you cannot dispute the verdict. [automated message]
  16. I will handle this case, You are accused of being the alt of a player called "Dave"
  17. Please refrain from posting troll applications the instructions are quite clear you may apply for Trial admin or forum staff. The next person to write a fake application will receive warning points. Application denied.
  18. Minutes Of The Meeting: 30/12/2018 Attendees(6): Henricus, Techno, Secan, Olaff, Foxy, Cheese Suggestions There will be no changes to the current bank system. William will get to adding new items to forums shop at some point. GS will still however only be a reward for winning tournaments. Plated Charger price will be dropped from 300k to 75k. Admins will now be accepted through a interview committee headed by a Head Admin in this interview the candidate will be ask a variety of questions so that those present can get a better understanding of the applicants way of thinking and knowledge. The final decision will come from the HA or HA's who are heading the committee while the other admins present can also ask questions and give their opinions to the HA. The interviews will be carried out separate to standard admin meetings at a time that works for the interviewer and interviewee. If a candidate is possibly controversial the interview will be done by both HA's who will make a joint decision. Please note this is only a change to the acceptance process not the application process. The "Retired staff" rank can be removed from people if information is brought to light, or it is deemed necessary by the head admins.
  19. No need to offer gold the Persistent kingdom mod team and or the community manager/ mod manager will review your banner request and decide if it will be accepted based on potential merits of doing so. Only the mod team or mod manager / community manager can accept it.
  20. Solved & moved. The complaint was solved by the admin and his verdict is the final judgement. If you have evidence that the verdict was given upon wrong proof, you may dispute the verdict by posting a ban appeal, message the admin on the forum or posting an admin complaint in this order. If you feel you were handled unfairly without valid evidence you cannot dispute the verdict. [automated message]
  21. I spoke to both parties and they agreed to a 300k refund and a warning. Kozubki does not have enough money at the moment so I will give him 24 hours to gather the required funds.
  22. There seems to be some confusion, this is not 11 separate counts of combat log. This is one single count of mass combat log on Kozubki in which the options are refund or ban in general. To be clear no matter what Kozubki chooses none of his members will be banned for combat log so the whole "I will accept a refund from his members" is not relevant as they do not owe a refund.
  23. Oh I see I forgot to mention. there is a formula for mass clog refunds of 15k - 25k per player that logs out so it will be a cold day in hell when anyone gets 1.5 million gold for 12 players (some of which are confirmed as returning thorough the logs) Unless the accuser has evidence that the mass clogging factions gear is is worth more then the admin determine average. The admin determines were in the range they want to set the per play price in a given case based on a variety of factors and variables.