Techno

Head Admin
  • Content count

    810
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

234 Excellent

2 Followers

About Techno

  • Rank
    Lord Inquisitor
  • Birthday 11/30/96

Recent Profile Visitors

2401 profile views
  1. Invalid & moved. The complaint was invalidated by the admin and his verdict is the final judgement. If you have evidence that the verdict was given upon wrong proof, you may dispute the verdict by posting a ban appeal, message the admin on the forum or posting an admin complaint in this order. If you feel you were handled unfairly without valid evidence you cannot dispute the verdict. [automated message]
  2. Henricus and I have spoken about this and this was clearly not a rulebreak. The admin team as a whole has allowed for back stabs in wars to take place and we do not plan to change how PW was played for the last 6 years. But we do acknowledge that some players may not have been aware of it as it is apart of the "extended ruleset" which was a guide for how to handle specific situations accessible only by members of staff but could also be used to give clarification of rules to players upon request. As such Jacko will receive a 1 million gold refund through the calculating of 40 members lost at 25k on average per player.Complaint invalid.
  3. Pending. From now on involved community members have 24 hours to provide any additional evidence or hints that could be useful to the admin. Refrain from posting unless you add newly found evidence or a reasonable defence towards the complaint itself if you are the accused player. If you fail to follow the complaint rules admins reserve the right to give out warning points accordingly. [automated message]
  4. This complaint will be reviewed and solved me. I will lock this complaint till it is solved.
  5. Solved & moved. The complaint was solved by the admin and his verdict is the final judgement. If you have evidence that the verdict was given upon wrong proof, you may dispute the verdict by posting a ban appeal, message the admin on the forum or posting an admin complaint in this order. If you feel you were handled unfairly without valid evidence you cannot dispute the verdict. [automated message]
  6. Ok so in the logs you can see Aitor said " 18:46:32 - *FACTION* House Swann [Knight_Aitor_Swann] loot it fast and just log after the war was declared you were well aware that their was a war going on, I do not appreciate you lying to me. I have been looking over this complaint and technically none of these log offs would be allowed. the players took the risk of staying to get more / better gear and got caught up in a war. Though a fear of losing their gear they then all logged out together on the orders/suggestion of Aitor. A accepted alternative if they really had to go was to use the suicide command and log off while dead. As such Aitor will be found guilty of mass combat log and due to the lying will serve a ban until appeal and his gear will be wiped. Edit: I spoke to Maxxxio and I will be removing the l lieing part of the punishment Aitor will now be banned for only 2 days for mass clog.
  7. Pending. From now on involved community members have 24 hours to provide any additional evidence or hints that could be useful to the admin. Refrain from posting unless you add newly found evidence or a reasonable defence towards the complaint itself if you are the accused player. If you fail to follow the complaint rules admins reserve the right to give out warning points accordingly. [automated message]
  8. Here are the logs I bolded when he war started. I will give both sides time to make their arguments.
  9. Denied & moved. Your appeal to be unbanned has been denied. If not mentioned by the admin otherwise, wait a reasonable amount of time before posting your next appeal. If you keep spamming appeals in order to get unbanned faster, your ban will be extended further. [automated message]
  10. I have looked further into your case and your appeal has been denied.
  11. Denied & moved. Your appeal to be unbanned has been denied. If not mentioned by the admin otherwise, wait a reasonable amount of time before posting your next appeal. If you keep spamming appeals in order to get unbanned faster, your ban will be extended further. [automated message]
  12. I have looked further into your case and your appeal has been denied.
  13. MassRDM, clog, banevading - NO APPEAL Ted Banned you but as he is no longer in the team I will handle your appeal. Can you elaborate on how you are different and give examples?
  14. MassRDM, clog, banevading - NO APPEAL You were banned by Ted who is not a member of staff so you could you please elaborate on what happened.
  15. Solved & moved. The complaint was solved by the admin and his verdict is the final judgement. If you have evidence that the verdict was given upon wrong proof, you may dispute the verdict by posting a ban appeal, message the admin on the forum or posting an admin complaint in this order. If you feel you were handled unfairly without valid evidence you cannot dispute the verdict. [automated message]