The admin(s) you are reporting also include whether they are forum staff, Game Admin or a Head Admin: William, Head Admin.
The time and date of the incident (in GMT+0, anything else will be ignored completely): Irrelevant.
What you claim the admin has done: Giving me warning points for no good reason.
The full story: In the following complaint:
I noticed a mistake from William's side. Where William said that Eliot (the person who the complaint is against) should refund him due to him not seeing the halt. While there is no evidence of him not seeing the halt.
William pointed out there is evidence in the complaint itself but he was most likely confused, thinking; there is no local chat, thus he didn't see the halt, which is not the case, the F10 logs is set on his faction chat, not local chat.
I pointed out that there is no evidence, instead of correcting himself he decided to give me warning points (you post is not hidden)
Uuh, NRR? And doesn't Aivar have to provide evidence that he didn't see the halt? Or did that change all the sudden after almost two years.
The only reason I can find he could give me warning points for is; You are not involved. Giving warning points for this is ridiculous. This is just as someone explaining/pointing out a rule that a complainee misread or anything along those lines. There has been dosen of complaint where the same thing happened and warning points were never issued. Yet this was the case.
I asked him to remove the warning points but he refused.