Trial Admin
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

431 Excellent

About Scorpia

  • Rank
    Is a seal
  • Birthday 05/02/16

Recent Profile Visitors

4178 profile views
  1. Whoever voted yes are fashion conscious individuals I hate how PW nowadays has so many rules that restricts players. If a server were to tell people "Hey you're not allowed to join that clan, soz" then the server is going to crash and burn. What I've noticed, even if a clan is totally shit and always loses, people will stay there because of their friends being there. Clans usually influx and outflux on their own. Leave players to their own devices, the less the server gets involved the better imo.
  2. @Himura "You may initiate hostilities with your previous assailants if they're still breaking your factions property after you respawn. " William has reviewed the complaint and should be responding soon, until then I don't see a need for myself to respond and I don't see why players are adding their opinion. Best follow the complaint rules and let HAs respond.
  3. Right but thats not what I'm saying, I'm saying you lied on your complaint. You failed to mention any of these things to twist it. Some might disagree with me, but in my eyes if you're breaking the rules you don't have a leg to stand on, or a right to report others for it. And as I said, or rather I didn't say anything regarding Lothar and his kill reason in the complaint itself.
  4. The full story: "I was going without weps to the throne room and i saw him breaking the chest, i didnt do anything and he killed me." Lets quickly break down your story here. You were going to the throne room without weapons 15:01:48 - Filipo picked up Spiked Mace(ID: 228) from the ground. 15:01:51 - Filipo picked up Heavy Heater Shield(ID: 331) from the ground. This is simply not true, you were armed when entering the throne room. Was this a lie? Or a spelling mistake Whatever it was it certainly damaged your credibility for this complaint You saw him breaking the chest and didn't do anything? Again thats not true is it, you already knew he was breaking the chest and you did do something, you alerted kept alerting people in faction chat that he was at the chests. You entered that room with full intention to kill him, whether he went straight for you or you went straight to him I can't say. But I can say your story doesn't add up in the slightest. When creating a complaint you need to add the full story, from what I can see your story is completely twisted to benefit you. You failed to mention you told people, or that you previously knew he was at the chest. None of it adds up to the logs and thats why I believed it to be ban mongering. Your history isn't clear either, with bans for ban evading etc If the HAs don't believe it wasn't banmongering, or it was too harsh, then they may take whatever action is necessary.
  5. The only time I wouldn't give 24 hours, is if the complaint was a few days old and no defense was already given. Players are encouraged to look through the complaints and respond to those against them. If they just wait for admins to post the logs, then another few days for it to be solved then we'll end up with a big back log of complaints.
  6. Old Merc banner I had, we never really implemented it Can pick n choose if any looks good, bit of a selection.
  7. Ye my concern would be people mass spamming boats, but I'd imagine you could put in a limit similar to animals.
  8. Title says it all, boats are often broken or left stranded, and the only way to fix it is by getting an admin. Wouldn't it just be better for them to respawn every few hours or give us the ability to build one from scratch. Bit of wood, iron and linen. When boats are spawned, they are usually left unusable after 20 or so minutes, they are used a lot just carelessly. It would be nice if a feature like this could be added.
  9. Could always steal some names from real castles, in Britain or otherwise.
  10. I’ve created a few in the past, they’ve never been used in any mod, if you want some new good looking banners anyway.
  11. Why is the fatty trying to be so professional xd
  12. The fact you won't even respond to any of the points I've made shows you have no argument. You also forget this Complaints may not be made for someone else, make your own complaints. The only exception is if the person making the complaint has been banned on the forums. which is clear in the complaint rules. This complaint is already invalid by default.
  13. What I said is exactly what happens in a skirmish. You attack the threats. Tyget broke no rules, even if the kill reason wasn't a skirmish Imry gave him a kill reason by insulting Beethoven. In many cases players start skirmishes because they see faction members come down and almost always it's to fight. It is a fighting game. The logs show no damage was dealt in less than 30s before you attacked Tyget, in my book that shows that the skirmish is on going. This is the last time I'm going to say this and the last I'm going to post. The skirmish at your castle Mount Hellstone was on going. By matching the feed on the video with the logs, it shows no one dealt damage for under 30 seconds. You and Imry walked down during these 30s/1min in the direction of the people that attacked, you then attacked. A skirmish does not end in mere seconds. And for argument sake say it wasn't a skirmish, Imry insulted Beethoven Lannister granting Tyget Lannister a kill reason. So please will you for the love of God get that in your brain, don't know how many times I have to repeat it.
  14. I don't believe the skirmish did end actually. 13:19:12 - Horse (Levy_VIking_North) attacked Ftm_Makarov_Lorraine dealing 11 damage 13:19:13 - Horse (Levy_VIking_North) attacked Levy_Cheesee_Lannister dealing 1 damage 13:19:32 - *LOCAL* [Levy_VIking_North] Bai 13:19:37 - Ser_Rickard_Lannister attacked KingsGuard_Illyrio_Lannister dealing 48 damage 13:19:37 - Ser_Rickard_Lannister <img=ico_blunt> KingsGuard_Illyrio_Lannister 13:19:37 - Ser_Rickard_Lannister killed a member of the same faction! 13:19:40 - Ftm_Robyn_Lannister attacked Ser_Rickard_Lannister dealing 14 damage 13:19:51 - *LOCAL* [Levy_VIking_North] Cus i can Those logs are visible in the video, that shows it was less 30 seconds before the last Lannister/North attacked a Lorraine. Imry and Thresh followed and attacked, there is evidence to say the skirmish was on going. There is none to say it wasn't.
  15. Sorry, kept putting the text in the spoiler: Are people going to still argue it's not a skirmish? The Lannisters were attacking Hellstone (Apologies if I got the name wrong) which belonged to Lorraines, your faction. They had killed the last of them when you and your bud ran down to pursue. They hadn't even left the castle yet. You swung and attacked Tyget, starting the skirmish once again. This was in the course of mere minutes. So that's only 2-3 minutes of the logs showing Lannisters attacking your gates and killing your faction members. Your video shows you both running down the hill after them, you claim Imry had no intention of attacking. What I'd like to know is, where is Imry to say this? You've posted this presumably without speaking to him, heck you said in your previous post you didn't even know the guy. So how can you claim to know his intentions? This is why it's against the rules to report on someones behalf. Even if Imry's intentions weren't to kill Tyget, why leave did he leave his castle in the direction of the people that killed him and his faction less than a minute ago? Before they even left the outer wall? The story doesn't add up and that is why it was made invalid.